|

The Fellowship of the
Ring
|
| Rated: PG-13 |
2001 |
Color |
208 minutes |
| Starring:
Elijah Wood, Ian McKellen, Viggo Mortensen, Sean Astin, Liv Tyler, Cate Blanchett, John Rhys-Davies, Billy Boyd, Dominic Monaghan, Orlando Bloom, Hugo Weaving, Sean Bean, Ian Holm, Andy Serkis |
| Directed
by: Peter Jackson |
Screenplay
by: Frances Walsh, Philippa Boyens,
Peter Jackson |
| Based
on the Novels by: J.R.R. Tolkien |
| Music:
Howard Shore |
| Movie
Co.: New Line |
|
Critique
Section
|
|
HugeReviews.com's
Official Rating System:
Pathetic
Wimpy
Solid Super
HUGE
|
| HugeReviews.com's
Reviews |
|
|
|
|
| Movie
Stills: Photos |
Links |
Awards |
|
|
The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the
Ring Store
|
|
HugeReviews.com Reviews:
Great
Lord
by Michael Flanagan
HUGE
As I write this review a full
12 hours after the credits rolled on The Lord
of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Rings, I
am still smiling.
I smiled when the movie started in
level-headed anticipation, and throughout the
approximate three hours, my smile turned into an
open jaw, floored, in fact, for most of the film
until the end when I proverbially picked up the
bottom of my face off the floor and readjusted it
to the all-too-deserving smile.
Yes, I could have started
this review without a description of parts of my
anatomy, using descriptive words and phrases for
the movie like AMAZING, WONDERFUL, THRILLING,
GRANDIOSE ENTERTAINMENT AS IT SHOULD BE, THE WAY
MOVIES ARE SUPPOSED TO BE DONE, TOO GOOD EVEN FOR
OSCAR, or something like that.
And they would all be exact and true, and
it would take all my will power to keep myself
from typing “PERFECT” and being okay with it.
This movie is ALMOST perfect, but put in
the decade of Gladiator, I would say that a
raise is in order.
The characters, from the mischievous
hobbits to the tall magical elves were played
exactly on the screen.
Ian McKellan should win an award for his
outstanding performance as Gandalf. He lit the screen in all of his scenes. I laughed when he laughed and I winced when he went crashing
into a wall and, well, lets just say there were
tears. The landscape, the set design, both real and CGI, was
awe-inspiring.
I could watch the entire film with the
volume off and still marvel at the beauty created
for this production.
The story, despite its length, moves
quickly…too quickly…by the end of the movie I
was muttering “don’t fade to black don’t
fade to black,” and I was ready for the next two
movies—all six hours worth.
Fellowship of the Ring
makes me feel like a kid.
It’s rare in life that you truly get to marvel
at anything.
Reality often turns into routine, and
breaks from that routine are rarely marvel-worthy.
Film should be a major device that brings
forth awe from the audience, and, frankly, lately
it hasn’t been.
With all the new technology available, and
the increasing popularity of Hollywood, one would
think that the creators of films would do all they
cam to make the most of what they can do.
I loved The Phantom Menace.
Gladiator was enjoyable.
X-Men was a wonderful surprise and a
damn good movie.
Harry Potter was a nice ride, a good
time. They
all pale miserably in comparison to Rings.
Perhaps with this film, the
bar has been raised.
Maybe the next to parts will be as good as
or better than the first.
Hopefully filmmakers will realize this and
strive to give us the beauty and majesty that they
now obviously can.
Another scenario is that nothing for many
years will achieve this level of cinematic
wonderment; that such a thing of beauty by its
definition places it in an ivory tower alone to be
watched and admired.
Look at the original Star Wars
trilogy. In the two decades following before Menace, was there
another movie that embraced these capabilities
like Star Wars did?
There were many good fantasy and sci-fi
films, but none that achieved that bar.
Even Menace fell short.
But with a more humanitarian amount of
hype, Rings has launched past the bar to
join those rare moments in film when you remember
not only your enjoyment of watching, but also
where you were, who you were with, and what you
did that day.
A cinematic classic of the best kind.
|
|

Movie
of the Year: The Lord of the Rings— The
Fellowship of the Ring
by
Christian De Matteo
HUGE
I went to Lord of the Rings, a diehard fan of the
books and prepared to be disappointed, though I
was still looking forward to it.
The previews looked good, but I knew not to
get my hopes too far up.
Well, I spent the majority of the movie
with tears of absolute joy (literally) in my eyes.
I never ever imagined to see these
childhood heroes of mine depicted so perfectly, so
brilliantly and so truthfully on the big screen. I'd been disappointed by the cartoons from years back and
assumed that no director in his right mind would
attempt the potentially damning task that would be
bringing the classic books to the screen, not when
the backlash at failure could be so perilous.
Well, Peter Jackson is either insane or the most
confident man on the planet because bring them to
the screen he did, almost as though just putting a
projector light behind each page of the book.
Clocking in at a healthy three hours, there are,
of course some scenes missing that Tolkien fans
will note, but nothing that takes away from the
movie. They
had to cut out some scenes so that it wouldn't
have been a six hour movie... though I would have
been just fine with that as well.
And
the casting, good lord have mercy, the casting.
Absolute brilliance.
One must wonder if the Good Lord in his
infinite wisdom put Ian McKellan on this planet
just so he could eventually play the great Gandalf
the Grey. And
then to cast the Devil himself, Viggo Mortenson,
from The Prophecy as Aragorn... for me the movie
was going to live and die on the acting for these
two parts of two of my all time favorite literary
characters... and it lived.
Adding Sean Astin as Samwise, Elijah Wood
as Frodo, Ian Holm as Bilbo, Cate "I can play
any part in the world" Blanchett as Galadriel,
Jonathon Rhys-Davis (Indy's pal Sallah) as Gimli
(another favorite character of mine, and the
plethora of other astoundingly cast actors that I
could go on for days about, the movie was filled
out with all the right players.
With a deep script.
Gandalf's speech about Pity sparing Gollum,
is a wonderful commentary for our current
vengeance minded world, as well as Aragorn's about
honor. The
film lives as an intensely real depiction of good,
evil and all the gray areas in between that can be
even more dangerous than the black and white.
It is a film about purity and corruption,
about love and hate and all without entertaining a
single cliche, only abject truth.
Should children see this? 11 and up, Yes. Will
it frighten them?
Yes, the evil will.
But this is no glorification or fun play
with evil. The
film will teach children to fear and fight evil in
a way that all children should learn.
Should adults see this?
Yes. For
the same reason.
I could rave on and on and on all day about this
movie that made me happier than a movie has made
me in the deepest sense in a long time.
I loved "The Man Who Wasn't
There," loved "Vanilla Sky", loved
"Moulin Rouge", loved "Bandits, and
loved "Sexy Beast" but I'll be damned if
I could wholeheartedly support any of these great
films over Peter Jackson's astounding "The
Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the
Ring." The
movie, in fact, could make me rethink my movie
ranking for the last five to ten years.
This is what filmmaking is about and this how to do
it.
|
|
|
DVD -- There is no better DVD
for no better movie than the Lord of the Rings Extended
Editions. Each with almost an hour of added footage and 2
extra discs of special features, you can't afford to miss it.
|
| Awards
& Nominations: IMdb |
Full
Cast & Credits: IMdb |
| Links:
Official
Site, |
The Rumor Mill &
Trivia Section: IMdb
Do you have any trivia or rumors you'd like to
share?
|
|